ABSTRACT
Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) were approved for use at the end of 2013 and have since been used for indications including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia and mantle cell lymphoma. The use of BTKis has increased significantly in the UK since they achieved NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) approval for frontline treatment of CLL in 2021. However, they are associated with significant adverse cardiovascular events. In September 2021 the British Journal of Haematology published good practice guidelines for the management of cardiovascular complications of BTKis. Our aim was to see whether these guidelines had been adhered to for patients taking BTKis. Method(s): Data was collected for all patients being prescribed BTKis (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) in the South Tees NHS Trust in July 2022. Patients' medical records were used to assess whether their management adhered to the good practice guidelines. Data was collated for 67 patients in total. Result(s): The data showed that although all patients were consented for the risk of atrial fibrillation only 6% were consented for hypertension and only 1.5% for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The guidelines recommend a baseline ECG (electrocardiogram) on commencement of treatment;however, only 7% had this completed and 0% had the minimum monitoring recommendation of 6-monthly ECGs. Thirty patients (45%) had an indication for a baseline echocardiogram;however, only one had this completed. For patients reporting symptoms of syncope, dizziness or palpitations only 50% had an ECG completed. Three patients developed worsening heart failure. The recommendations suggest referral to a cardio-oncologist;however, due to lack of availability of this service the referrals were instead made to the usual cardiologist. Conclusion(s): Although there was a lack of compliance with guideline recommendations, it should be considered that most usual checks were affected by COVID-19 outbreaks and a drop in face-to- face clinics, which were replaced by phone clinics and home delivery of medications. However, the premade consent forms for BTKis need to be updated to include consent for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. There also needs to be routine procedures in place to ensure that regular blood pressure testing and ECG monitoring occurs and that there is prompt recognition of cardiovascular complications. Action and implementation: To ensure improved compliance with these guidelines we plan to update our consent forms and create a proforma for clinic use to ensure that clinicians are aware of the various monitoring criteria required.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Croatian National Cancer Registry of Croatian Institute for Public Health reported that in year 2020 lung cancer was the second most common cancer site diagnosed in men with 16% and the third most common in women with 10% incidence among all cancer sites. Unfortunatelly lung cancer has the highest mortality in both men and women. Haematological malignancies had 7% share in all malignancies in both male and female cances cases. In 2020 190 newly diagnosed cases of lymphatic leukemia in men and 128 cases in women were reporeted, meaning 1.5 and 1.2% of all malignancies, respectively. Chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) is an advanced age disease and incidence increases with age. Impaired immunity, T and B cell dysfunction in CLL, chromosomal aberations, long-term immunosuppressive therapy and genetic factors can all cause secondary malignancies. Co- occurence of solid tumors and CLL is very rare. Although patiens with CLL have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies including lung carcinoma, the data about their clinical outcomes are lacking. Parekh et al. retrospectively analyzed patients with simultaneous CLL and lung carcinoma over a 20-year period, and they found that ~2% of patients with CLL actually developed lung carcinoma. The authors claimed that up to 38% of patients will also develop a third neoplasm more likely of the skin (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma), larynx (laryngeal carcinoma) or colon. Currently there are no specific guidelines for concurrent CLL and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment. Usually, when the tumors are diagnosed simultaneously, treatment is based to target the most aggressive malignancy, as the clinical outcomes depend on the response of the tumor with the poorest prognosis. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Case report: A patient with history of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 2019 (at the age of 71) with B chronic lymphocytic leukemia with bulky tumor (inguinal lymph nodes 8x5 cm), stage B according to Binet, intermediate risk. He was treated with 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab/cyclofosfamid/fludarabine). In 10/2019 remission was confirmed, but MSCT described tumor in the posterior segment of upper right lung lobe measuring 20x17 mm and bilateral metastases up to 11 mm. Bronchoscopy and biopsy were performed, and EGFR neg, ALK neg, ROS 1 neg, PD-L1>50% adenocarcinoma was confirmed. He was referred to Clinical Hospital Center Osijek where monotherapy with pembrolizumab in a standard dose of 200 mg intravenously was started in 01/2020. Partial remission was confirmed in October 2020. Immunotherapy was discontinued due to development of pneumonitis, dysphagia and severe weight loss (20kg), but without radiologically confirmed disease progression. At that time he was referred to our hospital for further treatment. Gastroscopy has shown erosive gastritis with active duodenal ulcus, Forrest III. Supportive therapy and proton pump inhibitor were introduced. After complete regression of pneumonitis, improvement of general condition and resolution of dysphagia, no signs of lung cancer progression were found and pembrolizumab was reintroduced in 12/2021. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 01/2021 and levothyroxine replacement ther apy was started. In 03/2021 he underwent surgical removal of basal cell carcinoma of skin on the right temporal region with lobe reconstruction. From 02/2021, when pembrolizumab was reintroduced, regression in tumor size was continously confirmed with complete recovery of general condition. He was hospitalized for COVID 19 infection in 09/2021, and due to complications pembrolizumab was discontinued till 11/2021. Lung cancer immunotherapy proceeded till 11/2022, when Multidisciplinary team decided to finish pembrolizumab because of CLL relapse. CLL was in remission till August 2022 when due to B symptoms, lymphcytosis, anemia and generalized lymphadenopathy, hematological workup including biopsy of cervical lymph node was performed and CLL/SLL relapse was confirmed. Initially chlorambucil was introduced, but disease was refractory. Based on cytogenetic test results (IGHV unmutated, negative TP53) and due to cardiovascular comorbidity (contraindication for BTK inhibitors) venetoclax and rituximab were started in 01/2023. After just 1 cycle of treatment normal blood count as well as regression of B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy occured, indicating the probability of complete disease remission. In our patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma excellent disease control is achieved during 41 month of treatment in first line setting. Furthermore, relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL is currently in confirmed remission. Conclusion(s): Successful treatment of patients with multiple primary malignancies is based on multidisciplinarity, early recognition and management of side effects, treatment of comorbidities with the aim of prolonging life, controlling symptoms of disease and preserving quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Advanced MZL is generally incurable, with periods of remission and relapse. Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), a potent and highly specific next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was approved in the US and Canada for R/R MZL based on the MAGNOLIA primary analysis (BGB- 3111-214;NCT03846427);here, the final MAGNOLIA analysis is presented. Method(s): This was a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of adult patients (pts) with R/R MZL (>=1 prior CD20-directed therapy). Zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) per Lugano classification. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy was assessed by positron emission tomography (PET)-based Lugano criteria for IRC-confirmed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease at baseline;non-avid disease was assessed by computed tomography (CT)-based criteria. Result(s): As of May 4, 2022, 68 pts were treated (median age=70 y [range 37-95];>=75 y=27.9%). MZL subtypes included extranodal (38.2%), nodal (38.2%), splenic (17.6%), and unknown (5.9%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6);32.4% of pts had disease refractory to last therapy, most (89.7%) had prior chemoimmunotherapy, and 7 (10.3%) had rituximab monotherapy as their only prior treatment. Sixty-one pts (89.7%) had FDG-avid disease. After a median follow-up of 28.0 mos (range 1.6-32.9) and a median treatment duration of 24.2 mos (range 0.9-32.9), 66 pts were efficacy- evaluable. IRC-assessed ORR (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) was 68.2% (CR=25.8%). By subtype, (Figure Presented)(Figure Presented)ORR/CR rates were 64.0%/40.0% (extranodal), 76.0%/20.0% (nodal), 66.7%/8.3% (splenic), and 50.0%/25.0% (unknown). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. Over 70.0% of pts were alive or progression-free after 2 years (Figure). Sensitivity analysis using only CT-based criteria (n=66) showed an ORR of 66.7% and CR of 24.2%. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were bruising (23.5%), diarrhea (22.1%), and constipation (17.6%). Neutropenia (8.8%) and COVID-19 pneumonia (5.9%) were the most common Grade >=3 AEs. Five pts (7.4%) died due to unrelated AEs: COVID-19 pneumonia=2, acute myeloid leukemia=1, myocardial infarction=1, septic encephalopathy=1. Hypertension occurred in 3 pts (4.4%), atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in 1 pt (1.5%) each;none led to treatment withdrawal. One pt (1.5%) had a Grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage while receiving rivaroxaban. None of the pts required dose reduction. Conclusion(s): In this final analysis with over 2 years of median follow-up, zanubrutinib continues to demonstrate durable disease control and was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observedCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Objective(s): The objectives were to provide an overview of the current practices of Near East (NE) healthcare practitioners (HCPs) by probing their prescribing decisions, to report the COVID-19 impacts on neurologists' prescribing habits, and to explore the future relevance of current medication used in MS management among other newcomers Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional study was carried out using an online survey from April 27, 2022, to July 5, 2022. The questionnaire was designed with the input of five neurologists representing five NE countries (Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan & Palestine). They identified several factors that play a crucial role in the optimal care of MS patients. The link was shared among neurologists using snowball sampling Result(s): The survey included 98 neurologists from the included NE countries, the majority of whom had more than 15 years of experience in the field, and 39% were seeing more than 40 MS patients a month. Effectiveness and safety balance was the most important factor considered when selecting the MS treatment. In the treatment of mild to moderate RRMS in men, Interferon beta 1a SC, Fingolimod, and Glatiramer acetate were the most commonly recommended treatments. Dimethyl fumarate substituted fingolimod in female patients. According to 80.7% of participants, interferon beta 1a SC was the safest treatment for mild to moderate RRMS. Interferon beta 1a SC was preferred over other treatments for patients with mild to moderate MS and planning for pregnancy (56.6%) or breastfeeding (60.2%). Fingolimod was not a choice for these patients. Neurologists seemed to discuss the top three treatments of Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, and Cladribine with patients with highly active MS. Conclusion(s): Most neurologists in the NE region followed MENACTRIMS recommendations for prescribing treatment. The treatment choice also depended on the availability of DMTs in the region. Regarding the use of upcoming DMTs such as Ofatumumab, Siponimod, Ozanimod, and BTK inhibitors, there is a clear need for real-world data, long-term extension studies, and comparative studies to support their efficacy and safety profiles in treating patients with MSCopyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Vaccines having aided in escaping the majority of the population from immunological naïvety, our strategies are now shifting towards an increased focus on identifying and protecting the extremely vulnerable. We here describe the results of testing 12 patients, those with lymphoid malignancies having been targeted their B-cells for therapy with rituximab-containing regimens or a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies after receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine doses. The interval from last dosing of B-cell depletion therapy to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was at median 5.3 (range 3.1–6.6) months. Using the ‘seroprotection' threshold of 775 [BAU/mL] for the anti-spike antibody titer, our finding points out the crucial unresponsiveness of the targeted population with 0/12 (0%) achieving ‘seroprotection'. Although IgG seroconversion was observed in 4/12 (33%), supporting the overall benefit of vaccination, the figures still point out a potential need for optimization of practice. IgA was further less responsive (unsuccessful ‘seroconversion' in 11/12 (92%)), implicating an underlying class switch defect. Those with depletion on B-cells are caught at a dilemma between, being too early and too late on receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. They wish to get over their immunological naïvety at the earliest, while, in order to assure quality immune memory, are also required to hold the patience for their B-cells to repopulate. Although it remains an issue whether intensified vaccine schedules and/or regimens will lead to stronger immunogenicity or more effective boosters for non-responders, we shall take advantage of every increasing evidence in order to optimize current options. © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Problems in the Pleura Case Posters 1 SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/17/2022 12:15 pm - 01:15 pm INTRODUCTION: Ibrutinib is an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk), approved for treatment of a variety of B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). There is an association of increased risk of bleeding with ibrutinib due to platelet dysfunction caused by the medication. Bleeding is usually non-life threating such as subcutaneous or mucosal bleeding, epistaxis, and ecchymosis. But major bleeding has been reported such as intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Thoracic complications from ibrutinib are rare. Below is a case report discussing a hemorrhagic pleural effusion thought to be caused by Ibrutinib. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient is a 78-year-old male initially diagnosed with CLL on flow cytometry showing a low-grade B cell lymphoproliferative process. Patient was monitored by Hematology and when kappa light chain numbers began to rise, a bone marrow biopsy was performed showing 90% infiltration of the marrow with lymphoid cells. Patient was started on Ibrutinib therapy and responded well to treatment. A year after starting therapy, patient presented to the emergency room with increased shortness of breath and fatigue. Patient was found to be COVID-19 positive and chest x-ray showed a large right sided pleural effusion. Thoracentesis was performed draining 1650cc of bloody fluid. Fluid studies revealed a lymphocytic effusion with RBC count 1,185375, WBC of 1751. Cultures and cytology were negative. On further history, patient was without recent trauma or surgery, CTA chest was negative for pulmonary embolism. QuantiFERON Gold test was negative, indicating low likelihood of tuberculosis. Patient was not on any antiplatelet or systemic anticoagulation medications. Ibrutinib therapy was held during hospitalization and pleural effusion did not reaccumulate. Patient passed away during hospital stay secondary to respiratory failure due to COVID-19. DISCUSSION: Ibrutinib is an orally bioavailable bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and forms an irreversible covalent bound to BTK at the Cysteine-481 residue. Ibrutinib predisposes to bleeding by inhibiting BTK and Tec, which play a role in the inhibitory signaling pathway of platelet collagen receptors such as glycoprotein VI (GP VI) and C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2). Our patient had no other risk factors for developing a hemorrhagic effusion. CLL itself can cause malignant effusions, one study found the incidence of malignant effusions among patients with CLL to be 9%, but the effusion was noted to be serous or serosanguinous and there was pleural involvement in all patients which was not the case in our patient. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a minimal amount of data to guide clinicians regarding the use of ibrutinib in patients at high risk of bleeding or on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. It is important to realize bleeding complications related to ibrutinib therapy can occur. Reference #1: Shatzel JJ, Olson SR, Tao DL, McCarty OJT, Danilov AV, DeLoughery TG. Ibrutinib-associated bleeding: pathogenesis, management and risk reduction strategies. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(5):835-847. doi:10.1111/jth.13651 Reference #2: Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, et al. Ibrutinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25):2425-2437. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1509388 Reference #3: Paydas S. Management of adverse effects/toxicity of ibrutinib. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;136:56-63. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.02.001 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by fatima ali No relevant relationships by Joan Wiley
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with lymphoproliferatie diseases (LPD) appear particularly ulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, partly because of the effects of the anti-neoplastic regimens (chemotherapy, signaling pathway inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies) on the immune system. The real impact of COVID-19 on the life expectancy of patients with different subtypes of lymphoma and targeted treatment is still unknown. Aims: The aim of this study is to describe and analyse the outcome of COVID-19 patients with underlying LPD treated with targeted drugs such as monoclonal antibodies (obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, brentuximab, niolumab or pembrolizumab), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib), PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib), BCL2 inhibitors (enetoclax) and IMIDs, (lenalidomide). Methods: The surey was supported by EPICOVIDEHA registry. Adult patients with baseline CLL or non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) treated with targeted drugs and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between January 2020 and January 2022 were selected. Results: The study included 368 patients (CLL n=205, 55.7%;NHL n=163, 44.3%) treated with targeted drugs (Table 1). Median follow-up was 70.5 days (range 19-159). Most used targeted drugs were ITKs (51.1%), anti-CD20 other than rituximab (16%), BCL2 inhibitors (7.3%) and lenalidomide (7.9%). Of note, only 16.0% of the patients were accinated with 2 or more doses of accine at the onset of COVID-19. Pulmonary symptoms were present at diagnosis in 244 patients (66.2%). Seere COVID-19 was obsered in 47.8 % patients while 21.7% were admitted to to intensie care unit (ICU), being 55 (26.8%) CLL patients and 25 (15.3%) NHL patients. More comorbidities were reported in patients with seere-critical COVID-19 compared to those with mild- asymptomatic infection (p=0.002). This difference was releant in patients with chronic heart diseases (p=0.005). Oerall, 134 patients (36.4%) died. Primary cause of death was COVID-19 in 92 patients (68.7%), LPD in 14 patients (10.4%), and a combination of both in 28 patients (20.9%).Mortality was 24.2% (89/368) at day 30 and 34.5%(127/368) at day 200. After a Cox multiariable regression age >75 years (p<0.001, HR 1.030), actie malignancy (p=0.011, HR 1.574) and admission to ICU (p<0.00, HR 4.624) were obsered as risk factors. Surial in patients admitted to ICU was 33.7% (LLC 38.1%, NHL 24%). Mortality rate decreased depending on accination status, being 34.2% in not accinated patients, 15.9-18% with one or two doses, decreasing to 9.7% in patients with booster dose (p<0.001). There was no difference in OS in NLH s CLL patients (p=0.344), nor in ITKs s no ITKs treated patients (p=0.987). Additionally, mortality rate dropped from the first semester 2020 (41.3%) to last semester 2021 (25%). Summary/Conclusion: - Our results confirm that patients with B--mallignancies treatted with targeted drugs hae a high risk off seere infection (47.8%) and mortality (36.4%) from COVID-19. - Pressence of comorbidities,, especially heart disease,, is a risk factor for seere COVIID--19 infection in ourr series. - Age >75 years,, actie mallignancy att COVIID--19 onset and ICU admission were mortality risk factors. - COVIID--19 acination was a protectie factor for mortality,, een iin this popullation wiitth humorall immunity impairment. - The learning cure in the management of the infection throughout the pandemiic and the deelopmentt off COVIID--19 treatments showed benefit in this partticullarlly ullnerablle popullation? (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Vulnerability of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and their susceptibility to Covid-19 infection is documented in several studies with reported case fatality rates (CFRs) up to 40%, but there is still paucity of data on identifying risk factors of their adverse outcome. Aims: To evaluate demographic, patient-related, CLL-related and Covid-19 related risk factors in hospitalized pts with concurrent CLL and Covid-19. Methods: Total of 81 CLL pts were identified in medical records of three University centers in Belgrade: Clinical Hospital Center (CHC) Zemun, CHC Bezanijska kosa and CHC Zvezdara dedicated to treatment of Covid-19 pts during pandemic (from 15 March 2020 to 31 December 2021). Results: For all 81 pts CFR was 32.1%. Age (median age 68 yrs;range 45-90 yrs) and sex (apparent male prevalence: 61 male and 20 female;M:F=3.05) had no influence on outcome. Pts with Charlson comorbidity index >4 (29/81;35.8%) had significantly higher CFR (38% vs 9.5%, p=0,025). Concerning CLL-directed treatment: 26/81(32.1%) pts were on active treatment (5 pts were on Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, 21pts receiving imunochemotherapy), 11/81(13.6%) pts were in remission on previous lines of therapy, while 44/81(54.3%) pts were treatment naive. CLL treatment history had no impact on CFR, as well as anemia (Hb<100g/l) that was present in 29/81(35.8%)pts, hipogammaglobulinemia (21/81;26%pts) and hiperferritinemia>450ng/mL (50/81;61.7%pts). Of evaluated laboratory parameters, high levels of lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH>2xUNL:6/81;7.4%pts), D-dimer (>1000ng/mL:36/81;44.4%pts), and C-reactive protein (CRP>100mg/L: 31/81;38.3%pts) proved to be associated with adverse outcome;p-values 0.002, 0.039 and <0.001, respectively. According to Covid-19 clinical course, the severe Covid-19 score had 35(43,2%)pts, and critical 19(23.5%)pts. Covid-19 infection was treated according to current National guidelines. Corticosteroids were administrated to 81.5% of pts, antiviral agents to 38.3%, IL-6 receptor inhibitor to 11.1%, antiviral monoclonal antibodies to 7.4% and intravenous immunoglobulin to 19.8% of pts. None of listed therapeutic approaches had impact on CFRs. Antibiotics were administrated to 43/81 (53.1%) of pts with documented or highly suspected concomitant bacterial infection (procaltitonin level>0.5ng/mL and/or chest X-Ray image corresponding to bacterial pneumonia), and the bacterial coinfection had adverse impact on CFR (51.2% vs.10.2%;p<0.001). Significantly higher mortality was documented in pts who needed supplemental oxygen (58/81;71%) (CFR 43.1 vs.4.3%;p<0.001), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (25/81-30.9%;19/25 needed mechanical ventilation) (CFR 88% vs.7.1%;p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, bacterial coinfection and ICU admission proved to be the most significant adverse parameters influencing outcome (p=0.012). Summary/Conclusion: Our study proved the dismal outcome of CLL pts with concurrent Covid-19. That could be mainly attributed to the high proportion of bacterial coinfections reflecting their frailty and sucessibility to both viral and bacterial infections.
ABSTRACT
Background and aims: Evobrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was well tolerated and effective in a double-blind, randomised Phase II trial in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (pwRMS;NCT02975349). Objective: report evobrutinib safety and efficacy data 2.5 years into an open-label extension (OLE). Methods: In the 48-week (W) double-blind period (DBP), pwRMS (n=267) received placebo (switched to evobrutinib 25mg once-daily, W24), evobrutinib 25mg once-daily, 75mg once-daily, or 75mg twice-daily, or open-label dimethyl fumarate (DMF;240mg twice-daily). At W48 patients could enter the OLE (DMF: 4-8W washout);evobrutinib 75mg once-daily (median ∼48W) then 75mg twice-daily. We report the latest available OLE data. Results: Of 267 DBP patients, 213 (80%) entered the OLE;164 (61%) completed ≥132W OLE treatment. Treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 165/213 patients (77.5%);59 (27.7%) had a treatment-related TEAE (six were serious;Table). Severe/opportunistic infections (≥Grade 3) were reported by 9/213 patients (4.2%);three (not treatment related;Covid pneumonia [n=2]) were fatal. Most patients had normal IgG (91%), IgA (88%) and IgM (82%) levels (OLE W120). Mean CD19+ B cells levels were 0.218x106cells/mL (OLE baseline) and 0.122x106cells/ mL (OLE W96). ALT/AST elevations only occurred in patients previously receiving DMF/evobrutinib 25mg, and within 12W of OLE initiation. Amylase/lipase increases occurred in 6 (2.8%)/24 (11.3%) patients, without clinical signs and symptoms. ARR, for patients receiving 75mg twice-daily in the DBP, was 0.12 (95%CI 0.07-0.20 [all available OLE data]). Conclusion: Evobrutinib safety and efficacy data over 2.5 years shows acceptable tolerability, no new safety signals and maintained efficacy in pwRMS.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus, is the third coronavirus with an associated severe acute respiratory syndrome since SARS-CoV [1]. Patients with severe COVID-19 suffer from immune hyperactivity, also referred to as a cytokine storm, which causes increased vascular permeability and multiorgan dysfunction and is a significant source of morbidity and mortality.1 Because Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) activity is thought to play a role in the cytokine storm, with elevated activity found in monocytes, it has been explored as a target for intervention for COVID- 19.2 METHODS : This observational, case-control study included 49 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Of the 49 patients, 11 patients received off-label Acalabrutinib between May 2020 through June 2020. The purpose of the study is the assess the use of Acalabrutinib as a potential strategy for management of COVID-19 patients. Bivariate and Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the data. The response variable was patient outcome (remission discharge or death). The main predictor of interest was the administration of Acalabrutinib on patients (Yes/No). For the multivariate analysis the covariates included were age, gender, change in CRP levels (Discharge CRP - Admission CRP), hypertension, COPD, and comorbidities status (Yes/No). Stata Version 17.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas USA) was used in all analyses. RESULTS : The median age of patients was 58 with a majority being male (51%). The average length of hospitalization was 17 days with 23 (46.9%) patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Bivariate analysis revealed that acalabrutinib was protective against death from COVID-19. However, these results were nonsignificant (OR 0.36, 95 CI [0.04, 2.87], P=0.31). The multivariate analysis supported the results of the bivariate analysis. However, we did not observe a significant association between outcome and acalabrutinib when adjusted for the study covariates (OR 0.32, 95% CI [0.03, 3.79], P=0.37). CONCLUSION: Acalabrutinib did not significantly reduce morbidity or mortality on severe COVID-19 patients. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of BTK inhibitors for COVID-19 in a larger clinical trial. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Objective: To describe safety and efficacy of tolebrutinib in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis at Week 72 (Month 18) in the long-term safety (LTS) extension of the phase 2b trial. Background: In the phase 2b trial (NCT03889639), tolebrutinib, a CNS-penetrant Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was well tolerated over 12 weeks with dose-dependent reduction in new gadolinium-enhancing T1 and new/enlarging T2 lesions. Design/Methods: The LTS extension (NCT03996291) consists of 2 parts: patients continued their core study tolebrutinib dose (5, 15, 30, or 60 mg/day) double-blind until the phase 3 study dose was selected (Part A), and currently receive tolebrutinib 60 mg/day open-label (Part B). Long-term safety and tolerability is the primary objective. Secondary endpoints include annualized relapse rate (ARR) and change from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Results: 124 of 125 patients treated in the extension completed Part A and transitioned to Part B. One patient (on 5 mg/day) discontinued Part A due to progressive disease and 6 discontinued Part B due to a variety of reasons, including adverse event (AE;n=2), lack of efficacy (n=1), progressive disease (n=1), and emigration (n=2). To date, no new safety signals have been observed. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were headache (12.8% [16/125]), COVID-19 (12.8% [16/125]), nasopharyngitis (10.4% [13/125]), upper respiratory tract infection (8.0% [10/125]), and arthralgia (5.6% [7/125]). There was no suggestion of a dose effect for TEAE or serious AE in Part A and no emergence of new safety signals for patients switching to 60 mg in Part B. ARR on tolebrutinib 60 mg was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.27);84.7% of patients were relapse-free at the LTS Week 72 cut-off. Mean EDSS scores remained stable to LTS Week 72. Conclusions: Through LTS Week 72, tolebrutinib 60 mg continues to show favorable safety and tolerability, and low ARR.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Report the safety and efficacy of evobrutinib over 2.5 years in an open-label extension (OLE). Background: Evobrutinib, a covalent, blood-brain barrier-penetrating Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was well tolerated and effective at reducing gadolinium-enhancing lesions in a double-blind, randomized phase II trial in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (pwRMS;NCT02975349). Design/Methods: In the 48-week (W) double-blind period (DBP), pwRMS (n=267) received placebo (switched to evobrutinib 25mg once-daily at W24), evobrutinib 25mg once-daily, 75mg once-daily, or 75mg twice-daily, or open-label dimethyl fumarate (DMF;240mg twice-daily). At W48 patients could enter the OLE (DMF: 4-8W washout);evobrutinib 75mg once-daily (median ~48W) then 75mg twice-daily. The latest available OLE data are now reported. Results: Of 267 DBP patients, 213 (80%) entered the OLE;164 (61%) completed ≥132W of OLE treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 165/213 patients (77.5%);59 (27.7%) had a treatment-related TEAE. Six serious TEAEs were deemed treatment-related. Severe/opportunistic infections (≥Grade 3) were reported by 9/213 patients (4.2%);3 were fatal (Covid-19 pneumonia [n=2] and E. coli sepsis [n=1];not considered treatment-related). At OLE W120, most patients had IgG (91%), IgA (88%) and IgM (82%) within normal ranges. Overall mean CD19+ B cells levels were 0.218×10 cells/mL (OLE baseline) and 0.122×10 cells/mL (OLE W96). ALT/AST elevations were observed only in patients previously receiving DMF/evobrutinib 25mg and occurred within 12W of OLE initiation. Amylase/lipase increases occurred in 6 (2.8%)/24 (11.3%) patients, but without clinical signs and symptoms. Based on all available OLE data, ARR was 0.12 (95%CI 0.07-0.20) for patients receiving 75mg twice-daily in the DBP. 6 6 Conclusions: Evobrutinib safety and efficacy data over 2.5 years in pwRMS continue to show acceptable tolerability, with no new safety signals, and maintained efficacy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) are associated with significant immunoparesis. Based on the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need to understand whether patients are able to mount a sufficient response to COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: MM and WM patients are vaccinated with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech), or JNJ-78436735 (Johnson & Johnson) in a prospective clinical trial. Primary endpoint is SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) antibody (Ab) detection 28 days after final vaccination. Secondary endpoints include functional serologic assessments and T-cell responses at 28 days, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months following vaccination. S Abs were detected by Elecsys assay (Roche Diagnostics), with 3 0.80 U/mL defined as positive and titers > 250 U/mL considered stronger correlates of neutralization. SARS-CoV-2 wildtype and variant S-specific Ab isotypes and FcγR binding profiles were quantified by custom Luminex assay. Antibody-dependent neutrophil and cellular phagocytosis (ADNP and ADCP) were assessed using flow cytometry. RESULTS: To date 141 patients have been enrolled, 137 (91 MM and 46 WM) of whom had an S Ab assessment. Median Ab titer was 178.0 (IQR, 16.10-1166.0) for MM and 3.92 (IQR, 0-278.9) for WM. S Ab response rate was 91% (83/91) in MM and 56% (27/46) in WM. However, responses achieving S Ab >250 U/mL were 47.3% (43/91) in MM and 26.1% (12/46) in WM. In patients 375 years, responses >250 u/mL were 13.3% (2/15;p<0.05). Vaccine-specific S Ab responses >250 u/mL following mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and JNJ-78436735 were 67.6% (23/34;p<0.05), 38.3% (18/47;p=NS), and 20% (2/10;p=NS) in MM and 50.0% (8/16;p<0.05), 14.8% (4/27;p<0.05), and 0% (0/3;p=NS) in WM. Among MM patients with progressive disease, S Ab response >250 u/mL occurred in 30% (6/20) as opposed to 55.6% (30/54) for VGPR+ (p<0.05). MM patients having autologous stem cell transplant within 12 months demonstrated 100% (5/5;p<0.05) S Ab responses. For MM patients actively receiving an anti-CD38 monoclonal Ab or an immunomodulatory drug, S Ab response occurred in 38.9% (14/36;p=NS) and 50.9% (28/55;p<0.05). Among WM patients, S Ab responses >250 U/mL occurred in 63.6% (7/11;p<0.05) previously untreated;0% (0/9;p<0.05) who received rituximab within 12 months;10% (2/20);p<0.05) on an active Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor;and 20% (3/15;p=NS) who received other therapies. Functional Ab studies were performed on 14 MM patients, 14 WM, patients, and 14 healthy donors (HD) (Figure 1). All patients were assessed 28 days following their final vaccination and myeloma patients had an additional assessment 28 days following initial vaccination. MM and WM patients demonstrated less IGG1 and IGG3 S Ab production than HD. MM patients showed increased IgA and IgM S Ab production as well as increased FcgR2A binding following a second vaccine in contrast to HD. Both ADNP and ADCP were reduced in MM and WM patients. MM patients demonstrated improved ADCP in SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351, B.1.117, and P.1 versus wildtype (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We report the first known evidence of impaired functional humoral responses following COVID-19 vaccines in patients with MM and WM. Overall, WM patients showed more severe impairment of COVID-19 S Ab responses. Most previously untreated WM patients achieved S Ab responses, however the most significant reduction in S Ab responses were seen in WM patients who received rituximab within 12 months or active BTK inhibitors. For MM patients, being in disease remission associated with improved S Ab response. Among MM and WM patients, age 375 years associated with significantly lower rates and vaccination with MRNA-1273 (Moderna) elicited significantly higher S Ab response rates than other vaccines. A defect in ADNP and more profound defect in ADCP suggests overall compromised opsinophagocytic activity among MM and WM patients. Data comparing first and second vaccine responses in MM patients, suggest less efficient class switching to IGG as well as incomple e maturation of their FcgR2A binding profiles but normal maturation of FcgR3A. Interestingly, ADCP was improved in several emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. T-cell studies are pending and will be updated. Further understanding of the immunological response to COVID19 vaccination is needed to clarify patients risks, and necessity for booster or alternative protective measures against COVID-19. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for an ongoing global pandemic. Phase III trials have demonstrated excellent efficacies of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in large population studies (Baden LR, NEJM, 2021;Polack FP, NEJM, 2020). Immunosuppressed individuals such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are at risk for a suboptimal response to 2 vaccine doses (Herishanu Y, Blood, 2021). The French National Authority for Health recommends the use of a third dose in immunosuppressed patients. However, seroconversion rate after the triple-dose vaccine is not yet known. The objective of our study was to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses after the first, second and third doses of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Data were collected from 17 French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) investigating centers and the French CLL patients' association (SILLC). SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-Spike levels were measured at 4-6 weeks after each vaccine dose. A total of 530 patients and 14 controls were included in the study. Vaccine response was evaluated post-dose 1 for 158 CLL patients, post-dose 2, for 506 patients and post-dose 3 for 66 patients. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were studied post-dose 2 by flow cytometry in 80 CLL patients and 14 controls. The median age of the patients was 71 years (range 37-93), 218 (40%) were treatment-naïve (TN), 136 (26%) had a prior CLL treatment and 176 (34%) were on therapy. Post-dose 1, the global response rate was 27% (43/158). TN patients had a response rate of 34% (23/67), similar to those who had a prior CLL treatment (33%,12/36), and higher compared to on-therapy patients (15%, 8/55, P=0.02). Post-dose 2, the global response rate was 52% (265/506). TN patients had the highest response rate of 72% (151/210) compared to previously treated patients, mostly by immunochemotherapy (60%, 78/130, P=0.02) and on-therapy patients (22%, 36/166, P<0.001) (Figure 1A). Among the 166 on-therapy patients, mostly receiving targeted agents, those receiving venetoclax monotherapy achieved a significantly higher response rate (52%, 12/23) than those treated with BTK inhibitors (BTKi) ibrutinib or acalabrutinib (22%, 23/104, P<0.001). Patients treated with venetoclax+anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (n=19) or venetoclax+BTKi (n=6) were all seronegative after the second dose of vaccine (Figure 1B). In multivariate analysis, the variables found to be significantly associated with seroconversion were age >65 years (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92, P=0.02), ongoing CLL treatment (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07-0.23, P<0.001) and gamma-globulins ≤6g/L (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.88, P=0.03). Flow cytometry results suggest a differential balance of the T CD4+ cell subpopulations in Binet stage A and in patients on targeted therapy compared to healthy controls. Post-dose 2 seronegative patients were proposed a third dose and to date, 66 have been tested for the antibody response 4-6 weeks post-dose 3. The post-dose 3 response rate was 42% (28/66). TN patients and previously treated patients had a significantly higher response rate (57%, 16/28) compared to on-therapy patients (32%, 12/38, P=0.03). We further analyzed patients tested post-dose 2 with the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-Spike assay (n=24). Those who achieved seroconversion after the third dose (n=10) had significantly higher titers post-dose 2 (median 12, IQR 3.0-40.8) compared to those who remained seronegative (n=14) (median 2.2, IQR 0.5-5.1, p<0.01), although both median values are considered below the threshold by the manufacturer. An additional cohort of 40 CLL patients who presented a SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination participated to the study and was analyzed independently. All patients achieved seroconversion after infection and a single dose of vaccine, even though 30% (n=12) had an ongoing CLL treatment. In conclusion, double-dose mRNA vaccination generated a humoral response in 52% of our CLL cohort and a third dose induced seroconversion in 42% of the patients who remained seronegat ve after the second dose. The major independent predictor of negative antibody response was ongoing treatment with BTKi. The strongest boost to immune response against the virus seems to be SARS CoV-2 infection, as a substantial increase in anti-Spike antibodies was observed in all CLL patients with prior infection, after a single dose vaccination.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are known to have a suboptimal immune response of both humoral and cellular arms. Recently, a BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was introduced with a high efficacy of 95% in immunocompetent individuals. Approximately half of the patients with CLL fail to mount a humoral response to the vaccine, as detected by anti-spike antibodies. Currently, there is no data available regarding T-cell immune responses following the vaccine of these patients. Aim of the study: To investigate T-cell response determined by interferon gamma (IFNγ) secretion in patients with CLL following BNT162b mRNA Covid-19 vaccine, in comparison with serologic response. Methods: CLL patients from 3 medical centers in Israel were included in the study. All patients received two 30-μg doses of BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer), administered intramuscularly 3 weeks apart. For evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific T-cell responses, blood samples were stimulated ex-vivo with Spike protein and secreted IFNγ was quantified (ELISA DuoSet, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). T-cell immune response was considered to be positive for values above 25 pg/ml of Spike-specific response. T-cell subpopulations were characterized by flow cytometry (CD3, CD4, CD8). Anti-spike antibody tests were performed using the Architect AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II (Abbot, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables while the Wald Chi-square test was used for comparing categorical variables. Results: 83 patients with CLL were tested for T-cell response. Blood samples were collected after a median time of 139 days post administration of the second dose of vaccine (IQ range 134-152). Out of 83 patients, 68 were eligible for the analysis (with positive internal control). Median age of the cohort was 68 years (56-72);and 44 (65%) were males. 19 (28%) patients were treatment-naïve, most of whom were Binet stage A or B. 31 (46%) patients were on therapy: 17 with a BTK-inhibitor, and 13 with a venetoclax-based regimen. 29 (42%) patients were previously treated with anti-CD20, 13 of whom in the 12 months period prior to vaccination. T cell immune response to the vaccine was evident in 22 (32%) patients. CIRS Score>6 and specifically hypertension were statistically significantly associated with a lower T-cell response (univariate analysis, p-value<0.05). Variables that were associated with the development of T-cell response were presence of del(13q), IgM ≥ 40 mg/dL, and IgA ≥ 80 mg/dL (p-value 0.05-0.1). There was no significant difference with regards to age, gender, other CLL-specific prognostic markers, treatment, and T-cell subpopulation distribution according to flow cytometry (Table 1). The presence of T-cell response highly correlated with both the detection of anti-spike IgG antibodies following the second dose (p=0.0239) and at the time of T-cell testing (n=66, p=0.048, Table 2). While 50% of patients who tested positive for anti-spike IgG antibodies also developed positive T-cell response, only 17% of patients who did not develop T-cell response, tested positive for antispike antibodies. Importantly, 24% of the patients who tested negative for anti-spike IgG antibodies, developed positive T cell response. Moreover, the level of the T-cell response (log transformed) correlated linearly with (log transformed) anti-spike IgG titer (adjusted r=0.26 and p =0.026 according to Pearson correlation, Figure 1). Conclusion: We show that cellular immune response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, is blunted in most CLL patients and that there is a correlation between T-cell response and serologic response to the vaccine. These results need to be validated in a larger cohort.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Lymphoid malignancies are a risk factor for severe COVID-19. Vaccination with BNT162b2 protects the general population from severe disease, but recent studies have shown limited seroconversion after vaccination in patients with lymphoid malignancy. This reduced response is likely related to disease and treatment factors altering both humoral and cellular immunity. Assessing response in patients with the indolent lymphomas, Waldenström's Macroglobulinaemia (WM) and Follicular Lymphoma (FL), including cohorts on differing treatment regimens, may help elucidate some of these factors. Australia has had low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection to date, affording a unique opportunity to assess efficacy to vaccination without the confounding impact of endemic infection. Methods Patients with WM and FL and controls were enrolled in a prospective study of immune response after two doses of BNT162b2 administered 21 days apart. The study had Human Research Ethics Committee approval and all patients gave informed consent prior to participation. Recruitment was targeted to obtain comparable proportions of controls to treatment cohorts. PBMC and sera were collected from participants immediately prior to the first dose (T1), at day 21 immediately prior to the second dose (T2), and day 49 (+/-7d) (T3). Immune response was measured by: flow cytometric detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (ASAb), performed using our recently validated flow cytometric live cell assay (Tea et.al. PLoS Medicine 2021) with increased sensitivity compared to currently available commercial ELISAs;live virus neutralisation to a panel of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern;and CD4+and CD8+ antigenspecific T cell responses. Statistical analysis of medians between cohorts were compared by the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test using Graphpad Prism. Initial ASAb IgG data for T1 and T2 is presented here. Complete immune response data at all time points will be available for the ASH meeting. Results Eighty-five participants received their first dose of BNT162b2 from 18 May 2021 to 7 June 2021 with a second dose 21 days later: 72 lymphoma patients (WM and FL) and 13 age-matched healthy volunteers (controls). Of 37 with WM [19 (51.3%) female, median 71 years (IQR 63-74)] 9 were treatment naïve (WMN), 15 had received rituximab-chemotherapy (WMT), and 13 were currently treated with a Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi): 5 ibrutinib, 8 zanubrutinib (WMB). Of 35 patients with FL [16 (45.7%) female, median 65 years (IQR 54-71)], 11 were treatment naïve (FLN), and 24 had received rituximab-chemotherapy (FLT). Of the 13 controls 8 (61.5%) were female, median age 72 years (IQR 57-74)]. No participants had detectable ASAb at T1, confirming no prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Figure 1 shows ASAb results at T2. The median mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of healthy controls: 60802 (IQR 17565 -78443), is higher than all WM: 0 (IQR 0-15010) p<0.0001, and all FL patients: 1687 (IQR 0-25421) p=0.002, Fig 1A. The median MFI of controls was higher than WMN (p=0.036), but not higher than FLN (p=0.28). The median MFI of WMN: 20074 (IQR 5421-35695), is higher than WMB: 0 (IQR 0-4217) p=0.018, but not significantly higher than WMT: 0 (IQR 0-14356) p=0.13, Fig 1B. Median MFI of FLN: 31476 (IQR 19351-51317), is higher than FLT: 0 (IQR 0-32849) p=0.01, Fig 1B. Conclusion These early serological data show measurable ASAb in all healthy controls 21 days post first dose of BNT162b2 vaccination. Treatment naïve patients had a better response than treated patients, and this did not differ significantly to healthy controls in the FL cohort. In WM, patients on BTKi had a significantly reduced response compared to treatment-naïve patients. This same reduction was not observed in the chemotherapy-rituximab cohort, but the characteristics of early responders versus non-responders, including time since last therapy, is being analysed. FL patients treated with chemotherapy-rituximab had a significantly reduced response compared to the treatmentnaïve cohort. Time constraints before the submission deadline prevented reporting of all mature vaccination response data. Measurement of ASAb one month after second vaccination, live virus neutralisation to a panel of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, and CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T cell responses at T1, T2 and T3, to fully characterise the immune response to BNT162b2, will be reported at the ASH meeting.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: TG-1701 is an irreversible, selective, novel Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) administered once daily (QD). BTK inhibitors, as well as the U2 combination (anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab + the PI3Kδ-CK1ϵ inhibitor umbralisib), are highly efficacious in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), each of which have been previously demonstrated to be superior over standard chemoimmunotherapy. Treatment with a more selective BTK inhibitor could result in improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with ibrutinib (ALPINE study, EHA 2021), and we hypothesized that dual blockade of the B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway through combination of TG-1701 with U2 may confer greater depth of response compared to either regimen alone. Methods: Patients with CLL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in an ongoing Phase 1 study. After characterizing the safety profile of TG-1701 monotherapy, a parallel dose escalation arm of TG-1701+U2 was implemented. Select dose levels of TG-1701 monotherapy and TG-1701+U2 were also expanded. All patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/patient decision to withdraw. Safety was evaluated in all treated patients, and efficacy was evaluated in all treated patients who had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. TG-1701 monotherapy data were previously presented;herein we present data from the TG-1701+U2 dose escalation/expansion and the TG-1701 monotherapy CLL expansion cohorts Results: As of July 2021, 142 patients were treated with TG-1701, 36 of whom were enrolled in the TG-1701+U2 arm. The median # of prior therapies across all treated patients was 1 (range, 0-10) and all patients were BTKi-naïve. Among the 36 patients treated with U2+1701, 19 were evaluable for efficacy and safety (17 too early to evaluate). The median age was 69 years (range 47-81), and 56% were male. TG-1701+U2 was well tolerated at 4 different dose levels without dose-limiting toxicities. The most common (>30%) all-causality, all grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (53%) contusion (42%), nausea (37%), hypertension, ALT/AST increase, and fatigue (all 32% each) with TG-1701+U2. Grade 3/4 AEs >15% were limited to ALT/AST increase (21%). Dose reduction occurred in 1 patient due to an AE, and 4 patients discontinued at least 1 study drug due to an AE: 2 discontinued umbralisib, 1 discontinued umbralisib and TG-1701, and 1 discontinued all 3 agents. At the data cut-off, overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (4 CR and 12 PR) among 19 evaluable patients, with remaining patients awaiting post-baseline assessment. In the monotherapy CLL-specific cohorts (200 mg QD, n=20;and 300 mg QD, n=20), 40 pts were evaluable for safety, and 39 for efficacy (1 pt withdrew due to COVID prior to first response assessment). The median age was 71 (range 49-86), and 43% were male. The most common TEAEs were increased ALT/AST (all grades: 18%;grade ≥3: 3%), followed by diarrhea (all grades: 15%;grade ≥3: none), and neutropenia (all grades: 13%;grades ≥3: 13%). There were no cases of atrial fibrillation, major bleeding, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the CLL cohorts at a median follow-up of 12.8 months (range 2.5 - 20.8). TEAEs leading to TG-1701 dose reduction occurred in 1 (3%) patient. No patients in the 200 mg or 300 mg CLL cohorts have discontinued due to AEs. In patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia at baseline, sustained improvement in hematologic variables was observed. The ORR among 39 patients was 97% (all PR/PR-L). Lymphocytosis resolved to normal value or <50% of baseline in 69% (24 of 35 of patients with lymphocytosis). Consistent response rates were observed across all subgroups, including the following high-risk genomic features: del17p/TP53 mutations, unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region (IGHV), and complex karyotype (defined as 3 ≤cytogenetic abnormalities). The median duration of response has not been reached in either cohort. Best change in tumor burden from baseline in patients with CLL is presented in Figure 1. C nclusions: TG-1701 exhibits an encouraging safety and efficacy profile as monotherapy in patients with CLL and additionally shows promising activity and a manageable tolerability profile in combination with U2. Future registration trials are being planned in CLL with TG-1701. Recruitment to this study (NCT03671590) continues. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: TG-1701 is a selective, covalent BTK inhibitor administered once daily (QD). Both the 'U2' combination (anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab+the PI3Kd-CK1e inhibitor umbralisib) and BTK inhibitors are highly efficacious in treatment- naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, each having previously demonstrated superiority over standard chemoimmunotherapy. Here, we report results for patients treated with TG-1701 alone or in combination with U2 from an ongoing Phase 1 study, with a focus on patients with CLL. Methods: Patients with R/R CLL and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled in an ongoing Phase 1 study initially evaluating dose escalation (DE) of oral TG-1701 QD continuously administered in 28-day cycles (100, 200, 300, and 400 mg). After characterizing the safety profile of TG-1701 monotherapy, we implemented a parallel DE arm of TG-1701+U2. Select dose levels of TG-1701 monotherapy were also expanded. All patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/patient decision to withdraw. Safety was evaluated in all treated patients, and efficacy was evaluated in all treated patients with CLL who had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Results: As of 30 April 2021, 125 patients were treated with TG-1701, 49 of whom had CLL. Enrollment was: 25 patients in the monotherapy DE arm (6 with CLL), 61 in the 200-mg disease-specific cohorts (20 CLL [5 TN], 21 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL, 4 TN], 20 Waldenström's macroglobulinemia [WM, 8 TN]), 20 in the 300-mg CLL cohort (4 TN), and 19 in the 1701+U2 DE arm (3 with CLL). Patients with MCL or WM in the 200-mg disease-specific cohorts were excluded from this analysis. The median # of prior therapies among CLL patients was 1 (range, 0-5) and all patients were BTKi-naïve. TG-1701 was well-tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose for monotherapy was not reached up to 400mg (near 100% saturation of the BTK at all dose levels studied). In the DE arms, the most common all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were constipation (32%), increased ALT (28%), bruising (28%), and upper respiratory tract infection (28% of patients) with TG-1701 monotherapy;diarrhea (53%) and bruising (42%) with TG-1701+U2. Grade 3/4 AEs were limited. In the CLL-specific cohorts, the most common TEAE was increased ALT/AST (all grades, 17.5%;grade 3, 2.5%;grade ≥4, none), followed by diarrhea (all grades, 12.5%;grade ≥3, none), and COVID-19 (all grades, 12.5%;grade 3-4, none;grade 5, 7.5%). There were no cases of atrial fibrillation, major bleeding, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the CLL cohorts at a median follow-up of 10.5 months. TEAEs leading to TG-1701 dose reduction occurred in 7.5% of patients. TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 7.5% of patients (all COVID-19). At the data cut-off, 48 patients with CLL were evaluable for response, including nine in DE. ORR was 95.6% for TG-1701 monotherapy (all PR/PR-L) and 100% for TG-1701+U2 (all PR). The median duration of response has not been reached in either cohort. The best change from baseline in tumor burden in patients with CLL is presented in Figure 1, and treatment exposure and response duration data are presented in Figure 2 below. In patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia at baseline, sustained improvement in hematologic variables was observed in the 200- and 300-mg cohorts. Lymphocytosis was observed in 70% of the monotherapy patients, with a resolution to normal or <50% of baseline in 57.1%. Consistent response rates were observed across all subgroups, including age and high-risk genomic features, such as del17p/TP53, unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region (IGHV), and complex karyotype (defined as three or more cytogenetic abnormalities). Time to event data will be reported at the time of presentation. Conclusions: TG-1701 exhibits an encouraging safety and efficacy profile in patients with CLL, with promising activity and a manageable tolerability profile as monotherapy and in combination with U2 (Figure 1). Future registration trials ar being planned in CLL with TG-1701. Recruitment to this study (NCT03671590) continues.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patients with hematological malignancies have a higher susceptibility to develop severe COVID-19 and their humoral response to vaccination is usually impaired due to the immunosuppression caused by treatments or the disease itself. A recent prospective study that analyzed the humoral response to the BNT162b messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine in patients with CLL showed an antibody response rate of 39.5%, significantly lower than that of sex- and agematched healthy controls. Patients with active disease or under treatment, especially with targeted agents were the ones with the worst humoral response (Herinashu et al., 2021). More data are needed to validate these results and enhance protective strategies in those patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the humoral response following vaccination with the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a cohort of CLL patients from routine clinical practice and compared it with patients with other hematological neoplasms. Methods: Twenty-two CLL patients underwent blood sampling 2-4 weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer- BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine. A control group was composed of 65 patients with other hematological cancers that also received mRNA vaccines. IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike antigen were measured using electrochemiluminescent assay (ADVIA Centaur XPT, Siemens), and responses reported as index inferior or superior to 1 (range 0.50-150.00), being index <1.00 informed as no reactive and index >1.00 as reactive. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation). Results: CLL patient's characteristics are shown in Table 1. Antibody-response to the vaccine was only obtained in 54.5% of the patients with CLL (12/22) and was significantly lower than that observed in the control group, in which 77.8% of the patients with other malignancies seroconverted (p=0.03), Figure 1. The other malignancies group was composed of multiple myeloma (N=21);indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (N=12), Hodgkin lymphoma (N=5);acute myeloblastic leukemia (N=1);myeloproliferative neoplasms (N=12);myelodysplastic syndromes (N=7) and aggressive NHL (N=7). Antibody titers in patients with CLL showed a trend to be lower than the control group [median 3.16 (0-150) vs. 52.95 (0-150), p=0.133]. Focusing on CLL patients, antibody response rate was higher when disease was not active (75 vs. 43%, p=0.1) and in treatment-naïve patients (66.7 vs. 52.6%, p=0.6). Moreover, we observed similar responses in patients who obtained clinical remission after treatment (56.6 vs. 50%, p=0.8%). In patients under treatment with targeted drugs (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) or venetoclax based regimens) at the time of vaccination, antibody response rates were significantly lower (33 vs. 80%, p=0.03). Specifically, 40% of patients under BTKi showed a serologic response, and only 25% of patients under venetoclax-based regimens. Of note, at the moment of the study, the disease was controlled in all patients under continuous treatment. Conclusions: Antibody-mediated response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in CLL patients is significantly impaired in comparison to other onco-hematological diseases. Our series confirms better response rates when the disease is controlled and in treatment-naïve patients, showing slightly better responses than published to date (54.5 vs. 39.5%), which reinforces the need to vaccine CLL patients as some of them will benefit. Special concern must be taken to patients treated with targeted drugs, who show very low humoral responses. Therefore, in this vulnerable population, preventive measures, such as masks wearing, social distancing, and co-habitants vaccination should be reinforced.